Anti Bullying free essay sample

No one deserves to be a victim of bullying. Bullying has the potential to damage the mental health of a victim. Everybody has the right to be treated with respect. Pupils who are bullying need to change themselves and learn to behave in a socially acceptable manner. Signs and Symptoms A child may indicate by signs or behaviour that he is being bullied. Adults should be aware of these possible signs and that they should investigate if a child: * doesnt want to go on the school bus * begs to be driven to school * is unwilling to go to school (school phobic) begins to be truant * becomes withdrawn, anxious, or lacking in confidence * starts stammering * attempts or threatens suicide or runs away from home/ school * cries himself to sleep at night or has nightmares * feels ill in the morning * begins to do poorly in school work * asks for money or starts stealing money (to pay bully) * has unexplained cuts or bruises * comes home starving (money / lunch has been stolen) * becomes aggress ive, disruptive or unreasonable * is bullying other children or siblings * stops eating * is frightened to say whats wrong gives improbable excuses for any of the above * is afraid to use the internet or mobile phone * is nervous and jumpy when a cyber message is received * lack of eye contact * becomes short tempered * change in attitude towards people at home. We will write a custom essay sample on Anti Bullying or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Procedure * The student should inform the Class Teacher, School Counsellor, senior students or any other teacher, a parent or adult at home whom the child feels he can trust. * All known/reported incidences of bullying will be investigated by the Class Teacher or by a senior member of staff. Parents of the victim may also be questioned about the incident or about their general concerns. * The bully (bullies) will be asked to genuinely apologize. The pupils will be reconciled. * The bully and the victim may be referred to the School Counselor. * After the incident / incidents have been investigated and dealt with, each case will be monitored to ensure repeated bullying does not take place. * Records of the incident will be maintained by the school authorities. Disciplinary Action Depending on the severity of the case one or more of these actions may be taken: Official warning letter to the parent. * Detention after school. * Exclusion from certain school activities. * In serious cases, suspension or even expulsion will be considered. Prevention SLT, School Counsellors, all teachers and School Prefectural Body are involved in the prevention of bullying through the following: * Creating awareness through student orientation. * Conflict Resolution corners in each class. * Writing stories or poems or drawing pictures about the negative aspects of bullying. Reading stories about bullying or having them read to a class or at assembly. * Role-plays directing students about how to handle a situation of bullying. * Classroom discussions about bullying and why it matters that bullies are dealt with promptly. Suggestions to Parents * Do not attempt to sort the problem out yourself by speaking to the child whom you think may be the bully or by speakin g to their parents. * Do not encourage your child to be ‘a bully’ back. * Talk to your child to build his self confidence and self esteem. * Inform the school authorities.

Othello Essay Research Paper free essay sample

Othello Essay, Research Paper # 8220 ; I am non what I am. # 8221 ; An essay on Othello, inquiry No 4. I will discourse this quotation mark in relation to Lacan # 8217 ; s thoughts approximately linguistic communication as the symbolic order. My purpose is to demo how Othello finds his individuality threatened by Desdemona # 8217 ; s reaction to his narratives. In order to explicate Lacan # 8217 ; s thoughts really briefly I will cite from Pam Morris: Literature and Feminism, ( Blackwell, 1993 ) where she discusses the declaration of the Oedipal crisis. For Freud the result of the kid # 8217 ; s fright of emasculation is its entry to the world rule and hence its entry into the societal order. For Lacan this must co-occur with the kid # 8217 ; s entry into the linguistic communication system # 8230 ; ..Language is therefore the Law of the male parent ; a lingual system within which our societal and gender individuality is ever already structured. ( p. 104 ) Othello # 8217 ; s individuality in the Venetian society is his function as # 8220 ; the Moor # 8221 ; . We will write a custom essay sample on Othello Essay Research Paper or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Few people use his existent name when speaking about him. When talking the given quotation mark, Othello is stating the Venetians how he won Desdemona # 8217 ; s bosom by stating her the narrative of his life, and he now retells it to the Venetians. This tale-telling is a manner of using the lingual system to reshape for himself a new individuality with more positive intensions than # 8220 ; the Moor # 8221 ; can offer. # 8220 ; The Moor # 8221 ; is an look the Venetians connect to other looks in the lingual system which all have a negative value. Examples are such looks as # 8220 ; old black random-access memory, a Barbary Equus caballus, lewd, and a devil. # 8221 ; The negative overtone of these words will reflect back on Othello. He can # 8217 ; t alter his beginnings but he can seek to alter the intensions of # 8220 ; the Moor # 8221 ; . He can make full the look with a new content and thereby give himself an individuality he can be more comfy with. This is what Othello is making when he is reciting his history. Othello is evidently a good storyteller ; Desdemona can # 8217 ; t acquire adequate of his narrative. Expressions like # 8220 ; earnestly incline # 8221 ; , # 8220 ; with hastiness # 8221 ; and # 8220 ; greedy ear # 8221 ; show Desdemona # 8217 ; s avidity for his storytelling. # 8220 ; And of all time # 8230 ; ./She # 8217 ; ld come once more # 8221 ; shows that this has been go oning over a period of clip without Desdemona turning tired of his narratives. The given quotation mark implies that Othello feels he has been excessively cagey for his ain benefit. Desdemona # 8217 ; s hungering for his autobiography is felt as a menace ; it may endanger his new individuality. Othello says that she would: # 8220 ; Devour up my discourse # 8221 ; . It is in this discourse that his individuality exists. If she devours up his discourse, she devours up his individuality and leaves him where he started ; as # 8220 ; the Moor # 8221 ; . Desdemona may stand for the all-engulfing female parent of the pre-Oedipal phase. This is a phase without construction, linguistic communication or individuality, an antonym to the lingual system, the Law of the male parent. It is with a # 8220 ; greedy ear # 8221 ; she # 8220 ; devours up my discourse # 8221 ; . An ear is sometimes used to typify female genital organ and will here stress the fact T hat Othello feels the menace to be feminine. That he, through his discourse, is devoured shows that this feminine menace is all-engulfing. If Othello garbages to accept his old function as # 8220 ; the Moor # 8221 ; he will either be without an individuality or be dragged by his self-fashioned individuality back into the pre-Oedipal phase. These options are two sides of the same coin, he will lose himself either manner. To give up one # 8217 ; s self is the same as self-destruction. Both decease and the pre-Oedipal phase are domains without linguistic communication, construction, purpose or individuality. To give manner to the one or the other will hold the same consequence for Othello ; he will no longer be a witting being. To salvage himself, Othello must acquire control over this # 8220 ; greedy ear # 8221 ; . Female gender was considered something chilling which could best be controlled through matrimony. A loose lingua was a mark of loose gender. Othello extends this impression to include Desdemona # 8217 ; s # 8220 ; greedy ear # 8221 ; . He marries Desdemona and all is good until Iago implies that Desdemona is unfaithful. Infidelity in a adult female will reflect back on her hubby. A cuckold is a pathetic figure in other people # 8217 ; s eyes. He must be earnestly missing in individual for his married woman to run after other work forces. Othello sees himself in the same state of affairs as before the matrimony. Alternatively of utilizing her ears she is now utilizing her gender to destruct the individuality he has built up for himself. I have already pointed out how ears and gender are connected in Othello # 8217 ; s head. Either manner the consequences are the same for Othello # 8217 ; s individuality. He sees his positive image of himself stealing off: # 8220 ; Farewell the plumy military personnels and the large wars/ That makes aspiration virtuousness! # 8230 ; .Farewell: Othello # 8217 ; s business # 8217 ; s gone. # 8221 ; ( III, three, 352-353+360 ) The one manner to command this menace is to passivize Desdemona wholly by killing her. He realizes excessively late the consequence this action will hold on his ain state of affairs. She was the lone individual who would accept the individuality he had been looking. He even had troubles believing in it himself, which made him an easy victim for Iago. So when he killed Desdemona he killed the positive image of himself. The individual he saw as a menace to his individuality was the merely individual who really sustained it. Because he had such troubles in believing in himself he found it impossible that anybody else should make so. This insecurity proves his undoing. His positive self-image gone, he is left a pick between # 8220 ; the Moor # 8221 ; or void. The minute Emilia realizes Othello is the liquidator she reverts to naming him looks connected to the negative image of # 8220 ; the Moor # 8221 ; : # 8220 ; And you the blacker Satan! # 8230 ; thou art a devil. # 8221 ; ( V, two, 129, 131 ) He can # 8217 ; t base being this individual, the lone one society and the symbolic order can offer him. To build his ain individuality has proven impossible. To be without an individuality, a non-personn implies decease. He chooses to liberate himself of this unwanted individuality by stepping out of the societal order and the linguistic communication system by agencies of self-destruction.

Ophelias Love Betrayed essays

Ophelia's Love Betrayed essays I would have to strongly disagree with Nicole's interpretation of Hamlet and Ophelia's relationship. They were most certainly lovers. Halmlet did without question offer Ophelia "tenders" of his affection, and we know this because she must return them to Hamlet. In addition, we also have the letter read from Polonius to Claudius and Gertrude in which Hamnlet writes to Ophelia I did love thee once. So indeed, Hamlet did love Ophelia, and evidence is also in the play that she did love the prince. When Laertes tells Ophelia to beware of Hamlet's love, she does not deny her love for Hamlet but responds that yes she will be careful. As for the song, no part of any of Shakespeare's plays is ever thrown in simply because it was popular at the time. When Ophelia sings that sing in her mentally disturbed state she is revealing the nature of her relationship to Hamlet and his promises of love. The question now becomes, who is to blame for the relationship's demise. Many blame Hamlet for being too hard on Ophelia, but her treatment and the "Get thee to a nunnery" speech is, in a certain sense, justified. Hamlet's entire world is collapsing around him. His uncle has killed Hamlet's father. His mother may have been a co-conspirator in King Hamlet's death(though there is no definitive proof) and, at the very least, she has married her husband's murderer. Hamlet has been betrayed by his close friend's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Everyone special to Hamlet has betrayed him. Ophelia has broken off their relationship because her father Polonius, forced her to, and we can guess that Hamlet knows that may be the case because shortly before the "get thee to a nunnery speech" he refuses to take his "tenders" back. He still loves her. But when he asks "Where is your father" and Ophelia replies "At home" he knows that now, she too, has betrayed him. We do not feel bad when Hamlet exacts his revenge or chastises the other that be tray him, so why do we b...

Social Justice in Colombia, Historical through today Essay

Social Justice in Colombia, Historical through today - Essay Example Popular landmarks include the Caribbean coast to the north, the Pacific coast to the west, and the Amazonia rainforest in the south-east. The land area of Colombia contains rich natural resources required for agricultural and commercial systems (Merchant, 4). Columbia’s apt topographic location, rich natural resources, and good climate patterns were the reasons why colonists are being driven towards Colombia to create subsistence- and market-oriented societies. The arrival of the Spanish colonizers has created a diverse population of 41 million people of Spanish descendants, African-slave descendants, immigrants, and indigenous people. It is believed that social injustices peaked during comprehensive land reform and slavery when Columbian government has been struggling for democracy. Social Injustice and Colonialism The development of social gap and inequality in Colombia reveals a historical link to colonialism, particularly to the cognitive and institutional path dependence between Spanish colonialism and contemporary Colombian society as evidence by violence, exploitation, slavery, and highly visible inequity in Colombia (McCormack, 106). The encomienda system, which was established during early colonialism, is an example of exploitation, slavery, and social injustice experienced by Columbians. This is a labor system that bonds colonialists and farmers. Colonialists were given free land and labor from Columbians and those who were under the hacienda of the military or local rulers have to work hard, endure cruelty, be a slave, until death succumb the worker. In addition to agrarian control, colonialists have also a hand at Columbia’s economy. Spanish rulers have full control and the church acts as the sole bank and source of education and social services. Excessive taxations are being implemented in a country where private ownership and union formations are prohibited. The economy was not good until Colombia gained its independence. Columbia ha s become independent but not in all aspects. Economy booms but not the status of the majority of farmers in Colombia. They remained as tenants and laborers and property rights became an issue as economy booms. Let us have a closer look on coca workers. While the Liberal and Conservative presidential candidates’ battle against each other, agrarian and poverty issues remained high. As a result of poverty, coca boom began in late 1970s and the high profits derived from the lure of drugs have resulted in massive migration of unemployed and landless peasants to the FARC-controlled colonized regions (Leech, n.p.). Thus, social injustices have pushed local farmers to become coca workers to ease poverty and improve employment conditions. Sad to say, the guerillas who claimed that they are only fighting for their rights were also in partnership with the drug lords. Guerillas controlled coca growing regions while drug lords took charge of production and trafficking. FARC or political f orces also see the benefits of coca boom as the taxes imposed on maintaining social order in the local population increased dramatically. Collected taxes are then used for improving weaponry and military forces. Coca boom partnership did not stay for long and narco-landowners organized own paramilitary services while drug

A Critique of Plato's Just Society using the Notion of Fairness from Essay

A Critique of Plato's Just Society using the Notion of Fairness from John Rawls - Essay Example He viewed that there could be a harmony or just society, only when these inequalities were either factored in or eliminated, and this notion of 'fairness' will be presented as a fundamental critique of Plato. The most explicit discussion of the tripartite part of the soul, and the primacy of reason therein, occurs in the fourth book of the Republic (435b). One of the first preliminary aspects of the soul, is that although the parts of the soul are distinct in their virtues, Socrates also stresses that in the functioning of these parts, the soul must be considered as a â€Å"whole† [Plato, 1992, p. 436a]. What is implied by this, is as follows. If for example, one desired food, and this desire originated in the appetites, it would still require reason both to discern the means of satisfying this desire, but also it would require reason to know when one has had enough for the sake of health in which case, reason would act upon the ‘will’ to suppress desire, so to sp eak. This is a ‘chain of command’, so to speak, which will be explored both as it is outlined in this section of the Republic, but also in terms of how this is established in the three classes of the state [Haworth, 2004, p. 13]. Further, it is important to similarly stress that the appetites are as necessary for reason for the sake of surviving. In other words, someone who had no appetite would starve, just as someone who had no ‘will’ or ‘spirit’ would have no discipline to stop eating or drinking. Thus, Socrates stresses that although reason is given privilege within the scheme of the soul, he also stresses that all three aspects constitute the ‘whole’, and this ‘whole’ is necessary for surviving. In some ways, his position on the soul can be said to be a refutation of Thrasymachus' position from the beginning of the dialogue where he argues that the just society is the one ruled by the â€Å"stronger† [Adams and Dyson, 2003, p. 4]. Socrates defines this relation, using, for example, the compulsion to â€Å"drink† extending from the appetites or the â€Å"irrational† [Plato, 1992, p. 439d] part of the soul: â€Å"Doesn’t that which forbids in such cases come into play – if it comes into play at all – as a result of rational calculation, while what drives and drags them to drink is a result of feelings and diseases? Apparently† [Plato, 1992, p. 439c-d]. Although the surface appearance, suggests that there is a complete opposition between the appetites on the one hand, or, desire, impulse, etc.., and on the other hand, the rational component of the soul, it is as though there is a harmony of opposites which Socrates is arguing here. What is implied by this, is as follows. Even though reason and irrationality are opposed, they are united in the very functioning of the soul. While the appetites are controlled through the â€Å"spirit† or the will [Plato, 1992, p. 440a], it is reason which makes the decision concerning how much control, or when to control the appetites. Again, it is important that we have appetites, and that they are necessary for survival, which reason is aware of, for the same reasoning, that is, for the sake of surviving or health, they must also be controlled. In keeping with Socrates example of drinking, it is often the case that an alcoholic, who is overcome by their appetites, may end up dying or being sick at the very least. Thus, the relationship between the parts of the soul, can be described as created a

World War II and the Holocaust Essay Example for Free

World War II and the Holocaust Essay History would attest that Adolf Hitler is arguably the most influential figure of modern history. Although his persona is filled with notoriety and his legacy is mixed with greatness and disgust, he remains to be an undeniable impetus for the shaping of the world that we know today. He had his dreams of eternal glory, yet his he ended in perpetual shame. The man that has sent the entire globe into a war that brought the world into seven years of hell would always be Hitler. He has enticed an entire nation through his oratory and his speeches and has renewed the human understanding of human atrocity and racial genocide. He has shaped most of the modern day political and international landscape, in terms of foreign policy, racial discrimination, and Zionism. The world that we know today is mainly a product of the scientific advances brought by the demands of the Second World War, the organized extermination of races, and the heroic actions of those who did not allow for evil to prevail (Bullock, 3-12). Having Alois Hitler and Klara Hitler as parents, Adolf was born on the 20th of April in the year 1889 in a small town in Austria called Branau. His early life was filled with poverty and hardships. He became a lowly painter, a military corporal, and even a peddler with a flophouse for shelter. This was a time when he harboured his deep hatred for the Jewish race. This racial dissent has made him infamous for materializing his ruthless intentions of planning an organized mechanism on the elimination of Jews in his entire sphere of influence, and eventually, the world (Bullock 3). Hitler has left an inedible imprint in the European History and even the Worlds Modern History. Despite the fact that Hitler has never been previously engaged in any government position, he became Germanys chancellor and rose to power at the age of 43 in the year 1933. He did not possess formal education on any kind of foreign language and neither did he read intensively nor travelled extensively. Despite this, he managed to create a set of ideas that concern issues regarding foreign policy that were incorporated with his perceptions towards local and domestic affairs (Weinberg 30). Hitler’s rise to power and his capacity for evil are both astonishing. Everything about him was not extraordinary. He had a poor physique and an unimpressive appearance. Even in his execution of salutations was regarded sloppy. He was an Austrian citizen by birth, not German, which should have made the German people regard him as inferior. He was not scholastically impressive and neither did his artistic aspirations flourish. Such an existence laid the seeds of his intolerance, and his hatred of Jews and the prosperous middle classes. He was basically a failure and he only sought comfort through his withdrawal into the surreal world of fanaticism (Warner 9). On the death of Hindenburg in August of 1934, Hitler became both President and Chancellor of Germany. This allowed him to gain full command of the country’s armed forces. This is very crucial in his plans towards another world war. Every serving officer and man now took an oath of allegiance to Hitler personally. Their loyalties no longer lie in the country alone, but to Hitler himself. They vowed to adore and worship their leader and to fight and die protecting him. When, later his actions demonstrated his lack of enough sanity, but their act of pledging their allegiance to Hitler kept them from resorting to actions that would depose Hitler. This is a tremendous factor in enabling the army to fight to their death, long after the war was lost, and Germany had been invaded and overrun. Officers and men had sworn an oath to Hitler as long as they live and would never cease to follow his order and fight for him (Warner 14). A tremendous part of the impact that Hitler had towards Germany, and therefore the world, is primarily due to his strong will and how it affected the German public. He was remarkably successful in impressing his concepts and his ideas on the events that transpired instead of simply allowing these events to alter his own ideas and perception. The realities of those times were not exactly in conformation to Hitlers own, and they have proven stronger than Hitlers fanatic will and intense energies. But the explosive events during the decade of the 1930’s were not a pure random coincidence. These were manipulated by the opportunist Adolf Hitler. This allowed Hitler to corrupt the German public to his Nazi ideologies that primarily concerned the indoctrination of racism, which provided a basis for Germanys hope to arise from her defeat from the previous world war. Germany was did not meet defeat due to inherent weakness, but due to her resilience to continue fighting for long periods with the world as her enemy. This is a deep reflection of the natural racial superiority among the Aryans (Weinberg 30-32). When he formulated his foreign policy, his concepts can be summarized into this statement: The German people were not defeated during the First World War, the Jewish people and their supporters instead stabbed Germany in the back. This racialist doctrine was very significant as it included a very crucial teaching; it rejected the biblical concept that man is separate from other creatures. This novel form of pagan belief implicated that there should be purity of race which can be achieved through breeding selectively. Through this, he exploited Darwinian concepts and took advantage on the then popular belief of the need for racial hegemony. This preached that such breeding method is essential for progress, to which Germanys foreign policy must be directed to. Eliminating the categorization of people could only be judged through standards of utility instead of morality. This is the basis of the perception that the allegedly alien racial stock, which primarily pertains to the Jews, the Sinti and the Roma, was a danger to the society due to their extensive dispersion and tremendous influence and to the expanse of the progress which their assimilation had made, most especially in terms of the German society. The nightmare of the massacre of approximately six million Jews and five millions others composed of Gypsies, freemasons, Jehovah’s Witnesses, homosexuals and other enemies of the state shook the world and have redefined the extent of human artistic cruelty (Weinberg 32-33). Hitler, as the leader of the Third Reich, was responsible for the outbreak of World War II. Had he not decided to materialize his plans of expanding the territories of Germany for the purpose of lebensraum, or providing space for the racially superior German people and take those lands that belong to racially inferior people, the world would not have met years of infamy and destruction. But this is just one of the reasons. The main objective of Nazi Germany was to dominate the world and to establish an Empire, comparative to that of the Romans, which would last for an entire Millennium (Bullock 625). Hitler promised the people of Germany to become all powerful, that there was a new hope for the German public that the dynamism of National Socialism could be harnessed to their own limited goals. Hitler was a very promising leader who could lead Germany back to strength. Although many opposed his rise to power, as they have recognized clearly the implications of his policies, especially in the field of foreign affairs, he overcame his critics. Before 1933, the millions who pushed Hitler forward and the small clique who installed him in office, by no means constituted the whole population. But there were vast reservoirs of support for the new leader to draw on, and for many years the support only grew stronger instead of waning. The national acceptance of the leadership principle implied the unconditional surrender of the country to the will of a leader who had explained for years what he would do with power when he secured it. Hitler fulfilled his intentions of the wars favoured by his supporters and has been much loyal to the ideologies he preached until the hour of his demise (Weinberg 53). Part of his â€Å"Final Solution to the Jewish Question,† Hitler tasked General Heydrich to meet with other German officials, political and military, in order to set guidelines as how to systematically exterminate the Jews. This is known as the Wannsee Conference. Through this, Hitler ordered the construction of concentration, labour, and extermination camps all over Europe. This is where the Schutzchaffel, the Gestapo, and the Eizantzgruppen disposed the Jews and forced them to be interned into unimaginable living conditions. The most notorious of the camps built during the Nazi occupation of Europe was the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp in Poland. It is the largest of its kind and is most known that once a prisoner enters it, he can never get out alive. This camp did not only send the Jews and other prisoners to their deaths through the gas chambers and intense labour, it experimented on the people in the camps for development of medical treatment. Dr. Mengeles exceptional interests on twins were highly evident as when the camp was liberated, most children that survived the holocaust were identical, physically and genetically. Dwarfs examinations and skeletal scrutiny were also some of the primary subjects of the studies done in these camps. Other forms of experiment included subjects into Siamese twins and even inseminating women with animal sperms. Other relevant experiments concerning warfare included high altitude tolerance, low temperature, and salinity tolerance. These are highly useful for the Lufwaffe, or the German Air Force. For matters concerning first aid, biological warfare, and even immunization, physicians in the camp deliberately injected diseases, exposed prisoners to surgical procedures never tested, and even experimented on wounds usually acquired in battle (Medical Experimentation). Such efforts made by Hitler are very significant in the modern world. It necessitated the world to discover new ways to fight a war, to seek better medical alternatives, and even inventing technologically advance devices. More powerful forms of armaments, tanks, and even aircrafts were primarily developed during the war era. The most notable among them is the dawn of a nuclear era with the race for the invention of the atomic bomb. Today, governments ensure that discrimination is an illegal act, that it would impose sanctions to those who would profile people for their cultural, religious, and even gender orientation. But most of all, because of the holocaust, the Western governments had strengthened their support for the Jews which have led to the establishment of an Israeli state within Palestine. This success of Zionism has impacted the contemporary political situation in West Asia, as this led to years of war between Israeli citizens and their neighbouring Arab nations. Although to other perspectives see that Zionism is providing a people without land with land without people, they cannot deny that it is already occupied by Palestinians who are now evicted from the land of their ancestors (Weinberg 319; Palumbo, Land without a People). The niche of Adolf Hitler in history is quite established and his reputation can possibly be never redeemed. He has waged a war against the world, with Mussolini as his only fully fledged ally, and has in turn sent over 50 million people to their deaths. Hitlers legacy is regarded no longer with admiration and glorification, as his name and the party he had built had become a synonym to the word evil. His doctrines and his actions are now condemned for posterity to remember and never forgive. Although some still hail his name and favour his advocacies and ideologies while other still despise the person that he was, it cannot be denied that he is pivotal for the events that transpired during the mid twentieth century. His role is that he is the driving force, the cause, and the perpetrator of the crimes against humanity that the world has never known (Weinberg 287-290; Adolf Hitler).

Catcher in the Rye: Holdens Relationships Essay -- essays research pap

  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Throughout â€Å"The Catcher in the Rye†, Holden Caufield longs for intimacy with other human beings. One of Holden’s main problems is that he sees childhood as the ideal state of being. He thinks that all adults are phonies.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  One of the first relationships that is mentioned in the story, is Holden’s relationship with D.B., his brother. Throughout his childhood, it is obvious that Holden has idolized his older brother. Now that D.B. is a writer for Hollywood, Holden considers him a phony, and accuses him of prostituting himself by agreeing to work for the film industry.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Holden has a close relationship with his younger sister, Phobe. They are total opposites. She has a positive outlook on life, while Holden hates life and figures he’s doomed. Phobe was his â€Å"ray of hope†, and brought him true joy. To Holden, she is young, and hasn’t become phony. He would do anything to protect her and other children away from adulthood, and preserve their childish innocence.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  At Pencey, Holden meets Robert Ackley. Ackely has horrible hygiene, and does not hide it. Although this is disgusting, Holden has more respect for him than for his roommate, Stradlater. Holden calls Stradlater a â€Å"secret slob†. Stradlater is like many adults, because he tries to hide his imperfections. Holden is the complete opposite, because doesn’t care what people think of him, just as long as he feels go...